Peer Review Samples for Data Visualization for All Trinity edX course

Section 2 Chart 1 Peer Review Sample

Students in the Data Visualization for All course come from several different countries, including Australia, Bangladesh, and Belgium.

Evaluate

  1. Story: Did the author clearly tell a meaningful story about the data, with text and visuals?
  2. Chart Type: Did the author choose a chart type that best matches their data story?
  3. Embed: Did the author embed an interactive chart into the web page?
  4. Good Design: Did the author follow principles of good chart design?

Section 2 Chart 1 Peer Review Sample with Notes

Students in the Data Visualization for All course come from several different countries, including Australia, Bangladesh, and Belgium.

Evaluate

  1. Story: Did the author clearly tell a meaningful story about the data, with text and visuals?
  1. Chart Type: Did the author choose a chart type that best matches their data story?
  1. Embed: Did the author embed an interactive chart into the web page?
  1. Good Design: Did the author follow principles of good chart design?

Section 2 Chart 2 Peer Review Sample

Nations with the highest percentage of female students enrolled in Data Visualization for All are the Ukraine (51 percent) and Turkey (47 percent), based on preliminary data for those with high enrollment levels (25 or more students).

View the preliminary data for 21 Feb 2017 from http://handsondataviz.org

Evaluate

  1. Story: Did the author clearly tell a meaningful story about the data, with text and visuals?
  2. Chart Type: Did the author choose a chart type that best matches their data story?
  3. Embed: Did the author embed an interactive chart into the web page?
  4. Good Design: Did the author follow principles of good chart design?

Section 2 Chart 2 Peer Review Sample with Notes

Nations with the highest percentage of female students enrolled in Data Visualization for All are the Ukraine (51 percent) and Turkey (47 percent), based on preliminary data for those with high enrollment levels (25 or more students).

View the preliminary data for 21 Feb 2017 from http://handsondataviz.org

Evaluate

  1. Story: Did the author clearly tell a meaningful story about the data, with text and visuals?
  1. Chart Type: Did the author choose a chart type that best matches their data story?
  1. Embed: Did the author embed an interactive chart into the web page?
  1. Good Design: Did the author follow principles of good chart design?

Section 3 Peer Review Sample 1

My Leaflet map

My Highcharts scatter chart

Evaluate

  1. Leaflet map and title: Did the author embed an interactive Leaflet map with a new title?
  2. Leaflet map layers: Did the author add controls that toggle on/off different map layers?
  3. Leaflet point markers: Did the author upload a new set of markers, with pop-ups that show titles for each point?
  4. Highcharts scatter chart: Did the author embed an interactive Highcharts scatter chart with a new title and axis labels?
  5. Highcharts data tooltips: Did the author upload a new set of data, with tooltips that show labels and details for each point?
  6. Additional comments for the author. What works well? What could be improved?

Section 3 Peer Review Sample 1 with Notes

My Leaflet map

My Highcharts scatter chart

Evaluate

  1. Leaflet map and title: Did the author embed an interactive Leaflet map with a new title?
  1. Leaflet map layers: Did the author add controls that toggle on/off different map layers?
  1. Leaflet point markers: Did the author upload a new set of markers, with pop-ups that show titles for each point?
  1. Highcharts scatter chart: Did the author embed an interactive Highcharts scatter chart with a new title and axis labels?
  1. Highcharts data tooltips: Did the author upload a new set of data, with tooltips that show labels and details for each point?
  1. Additional comments for the author. What works well? What could be improved?

Section 3 Peer Review Sample 2

My Leaflet map

My Highcharts scatter chart

Evaluate

  1. Leaflet map and title: Did the author embed an interactive Leaflet map with a new title?
  2. Leaflet map layers: Did the author add controls that toggle on/off different map layers?
  3. Leaflet point markers: Did the author upload a new set of markers, with pop-ups that show titles for each point?
  4. Highcharts scatter chart: Did the author embed an interactive Highcharts scatter chart with a new title and axis labels?
  5. Highcharts data tooltips: Did the author upload a new set of data, with tooltips that show labels and details for each point?
  6. Additional comments for the author. What works well? What could be improved?

Section 3 Peer Review Sample 2 with Notes

My Leaflet map

My Highcharts scatter chart

Evaluate

  1. Leaflet map and title: Did the author embed an interactive Leaflet map with a new title?
  1. Leaflet map layers: Did the author add controls that toggle on/off different map layers?
  1. Leaflet point markers: Did the author upload a new set of markers, with pop-ups that show titles for each point?
  1. Highcharts scatter chart: Did the author embed an interactive Highcharts scatter chart with a new title and axis labels?
  1. Highcharts data tooltips: Did the author upload a new set of data, with tooltips that show labels and details for each point?
  1. Additional comments for the author. What works well? What could be improved?